大学生疯狂高潮呻吟免费视频,成人特级毛片全部免费播放,精品一卡二卡三卡四卡兔,国产美女被遭强高潮白浆

Unitalen Client Won the Patent Invalidation Case Concerning the Method Used in the Construction of the Largest Hydroelectric Dam in the World

November 14, 2019

Case Summary

Baihetan Hydroelectric Dam is in the mainstream of the lower reaches of the Jinsha River in both Sichuan and Yunnan Province. It is the first-class hydroelectric dam in the “Yangtze River Basin Comprehensive Planning (2012-2030)” approved by the State Council. It is also the world’s largest hydroelectric dam under construction.

Defendant A, the 8th Hydropower Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. Of Sinohydro, was contracted for the civil construction and metal structure installation on the right bank of the Baihetan Hydroelectric Dam. In order to implement the installation of the gate groove to seal the bottom hole in the right bank dam project, defendant A used the “doorway hydraulic self-climbing formwork trolley” device manufactured and sold by defendant B - Beijing Zhuoliang Formwork Co., Ltd.

The plaintiff, Chengdu Alang Technology Co., Ltd. is the right holder of the No. ZL201310018684.3 invention patent, entitled “A construction method and device for gate slot”, they believed that the two defendants had constituted patent infringement, so that they initiated litigation at the Intermediate People’s Court of Changsha City. The case number is (2018) Hunan Province Civil First Instance No. 7000.

Unitalen Attorneys at Law represented the defendant in response to the charge.

The Court’s Ruling

On August 21, 2019, Unitalen received the No. 41305 Invalidation Decision issued by the National Intellectual Property Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department, which confirmed that all the rights in No. ZL201310018684.3 patent are invalid.

On September 9, 2019, the Changsha Intermediate People's Court issued the civil judgement that it’s allowed for Chengdu Alang Technology Co., Ltd. to withdraw the lawsuit.

Herewithin, Unitalen helped the defendant win a comprehensive victory of this patent infringement and invalidation case. This case is a typical case of applying Paragraphs 3 and 4, Article 26 of the Patent Law to invalidate patents successfully.

 

Keywords

万全县| 靖宇县| 弋阳县| 巴林右旗| 新余市| 抚州市| 洞口县| 商洛市| 阿拉善左旗| 合川市| 屯昌县| 璧山县| 蒙城县| 大兴区| 柘荣县| 岑溪市| 恩施市| 台东市| 塔城市| 峨眉山市| 鹰潭市| 灵寿县| 天镇县| 峡江县| 连平县| 永登县| 额敏县| 大宁县| 北川| 太原市| 玛纳斯县| 永康市| 寿宁县| 新建县| 饶阳县| 上饶市| 文水县| 郧西县| 基隆市| 韶关市| 大同县|